arXiv:2606.20493: Contagion Networks — how evaluator bias infects an entire multi-agent system

One agent’s bias can infect the entire network

When LLMs evaluate each other — a common pattern in modern multi-agent systems — the error or bias of a single evaluator does not remain isolated. Zewen Liu (arXiv:2606.20493, published June 19, 2026) proves this mathematically by introducing the Contagion Networks framework: each agent in the network has a measurable “infection rate” describing how much of its biases neighboring agents absorb.

Contagion coefficients γ between 0.157 and 0.352

In experiments with three DeepSeek-chat agents acting as evaluators, the measured contagion coefficients γ consistently fall in the range 0.157–0.352. This means that between 15 and 35 percent of one agent’s bias “slides” on average toward others within the same evaluation session. By comparison, homogeneous configurations — where all agents come from the same model — show 3 to 5 times weaker contagion than cross-model setups, where architectural diversity paradoxically increases the risk of mutual influence.

A panel of three evaluators reduces contagion by 72.4%

The key finding is also a practical recommendation: expanding the evaluator panel from one to three members reduces effective contagion by 72.4%. The mechanism is statistical — more independent votes make it harder for a single biased perspective to dominate.

Open-source testing framework

Liu also releases an open-source framework that allows researchers to measure bias propagation in their own multi-agent setups, making the work directly applicable to agent design engineering practices today.