arXiv:2607.13292: Theory-Level Autoformalization — Entire Mathematical Bases Instead of Isolated Statements (ICML 2026)

What Is Autoformalization and Why Is It Hard?

Autoformalization is the automatic translation of mathematical texts from natural language into a machine-verifiable formal form — the kind used by proof assistants such as Lean or Isabelle. Every formal statement must be unambiguously correct and computationally verifiable, requiring precision far beyond the level of academic publications. Previous systems treated each statement as an independent unit, ignoring the context that mathematicians take for granted.

Why Are Isolated Statements Not Enough?

Authors Marcus J. Min, Mike He, Zhaoyu Li, and collaborators including Osbert Bastani argue that formal mathematics requires a “network of interdependencies” — axioms define foundations, definitions build abstractions, lemmas pave the way for theorems. Formalizing only theorems without this network is like translating a single sentence from a novel without knowing the preceding chapters: the form may be correct, but the meaning remains incomplete. The paper was accepted as a Spotlight presentation at ICML 2026, which the program committee ranks among the highest-rated papers at the conference; the GitHub repository is publicly available for reproduction.

Three Paths Forward and the Broader Context

The researchers offer 3 concrete paths forward for theory-level formalization. For comparison, previous benchmarks like miniF2F tested models on sets of isolated olympiad problems — an approach that, according to the authors, systematically underestimates the gap between machine and human mathematical competence when theoretical depth is at stake. The shift toward complete theory formalization opens the way for AI systems that can autonomously build and extend mathematical knowledge bases, rather than merely verifying pre-specified statements.